Its ability to
self-seal, create apatite, and to fight off cavities...
this bioactive material is the future of wherewe’re at in dentistry.
Dr. Todd C. Snyder
USE THE BEST CEMENT
|
Product InformationManufacturer name: Doxa Dental AB (Sweden)
Manufacturer item code: 40030 Product category: Dental Cement Product subcategory: Cement Packaging: Paper box. 20 foiled capsules and Instructions for Use Packaging size: Height 60mm, witdh 187mm, depth 80mm Packaging weight: Approx. 147g/0.34 pounds per box Capsule: Each capsule - 0,17ml mixed cement Storage: Store between 4°C/39°F and 20°C/68°F At three years plus of continual use in my practice,
Dental podcast hosted by Dr. Phil Klein: This Viva Podcast will discuss the most important features in a crown and bridge cement. Our guest is Dr. Robert Lowe, an expert in the field of esthetic dentistry and composite restorative materials and procedures. Dr. Lowe received the 2004 Gordon Christensen Outstanding Lecturers Award and in 2005 was awarded Diplomat status on the American Board of Aesthetic Dentistry. Currently in private practice in Charlotte, North Carolina, Dr. Lowe lectures internationally, is a regular speaker for Viva Learning and publishes in a variety of dental journals on esthetic and restorative dentistry.
QuikCapThe cement is supplied in our QuikCap capsule, for easy mixing and direct application. Each capsule provides a mixed volume of at least 0.17 ml cement.
Dr. John Comisi on QuikCapsDr. Todd Snyder. Webinar with clinical case.DOCUMENTS
SDS
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related products
Ceramir Crown & Bridge QuikCap
|
Ceramir Crown & Bridge QuikCap
|
Ceramir
|
Ceramir
|
Ease of use: (9-12). Patient experience: (5-8). Save time and money: (9-12). Minimize the risk of secondary decay: (1-4). 1.Lööf, J. et al. (2008) A comparative study of the bioactivity of three materials for dental applications. Dental Materials, 24, 653-659. 2.Engstrand, J. et al. (2012) Hydroxyapatite Formation on a Novel Dental Cement in Human Saliva, ISRN Dentistry, ID 624056. 3. Jefferies, SR. et al. (2015) Preliminary Evidence That Bioactive Cements Occlude Artificial Marginal Gaps, Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 27(3), 155-166. 4. Engqvist, H. et al. (2004) Chemical and biological integration of a mouldable bioactive ceramic material capable of forming apatite in vivo in teeth. Biomaterials, 25, 2781-2787. 5.Marvin, JC .et al. (2018) In Vitro Evaluation of Cell Compatibility of Dental Cements Used with Titanium Implant Components. Journal of Prosthodontics. 6. Jefferies, SR. et al. (2013) A Review of Luting Agents, Properties and Bioactivity. Dental Learning, 2(7). 7.Pameijer, CH. (2012) A Review of Luting Agents. International Journal of Dentistry, ID 752861. 8. Pameijer, CH et al. (2008) In vitro and In vivo Biocompatibility tests with XeraCem. Journal of Dental Research, 87(B), 3097. 9. Jefferies, SR. et al. (2009) One year clinical performance and post-operative sensitivity of a bioactive dental luting cement – A prospective clinical study. Swedish Dental Journal, 33, 193-199. 10. Jefferies, SR. et al. (2012) Prospective Observation of a New Bioactive Luting Cement: 2-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Prosthodontics, 21, 33-41. 11. Jefferies, SR. et al. (2013) A bioactive dental luting cement—its retentive properties and 3-year clinical findings. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 34(spec no 1), 2-9. 12. Hakim, F. et al. (2015) In Search of the Ideal Dental Cement…. Have We Arrived? Oral Health
